AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF NAHEMA CANTY, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the petition is granted.

A court, after considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances presented to it, has the discretion to extend the time to serve a notice of claim (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e; Matter of Battle v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 614). One of the factors that should be accorded great weight is whether the City of New York received actual knowledge of the facts constituting the claim in a timely manner (see, Matter of Battle v. City of New York, supra). Here, the City had actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of its accrual. As the City had actual knowledge of the essential facts underlying the claim, there is no substantial prejudice to the City as a result of the delay. Accordingly, the petition should have been granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CANTY v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Jul 26, 2000)