Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

DONALD McKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee.

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

1. CRIMINAL LAW — Sentencing — Calculation of Release Dates Department of Correction. Calculation of release dates is the responsibility of the Department of Corrections.

2. HABEAS CORPUS — Challenge to Department of Correction's Calculation of Release Date — Petition Must Be Filed in County of Incarceration. A petition challenging the Department of Corrections' calculation of release dates must be filed pursuant to K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 60-1501(a) in the county of incarceration rather than with the sentencing court.

ELLIOTT, J.:

Donald McKinney appeals the dismissal of his K.S.A. 60-1507 petition.

We affirm.

McKinney was on parole when convicted of new offenses in 1992. The trial court imposed a sentence to run consecutive to the prior sentence.

McKinney has moved for summary disposition pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7.041a (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 47).

A careful review of the pleadings reflects McKinney is not challenging the legality of the sentence imposed by the trial court; rather, he is challenging the Department of Corrections' (DOC) aggregation of his two sentences and the calculation of his conditional release and maximum release dates pursuant to that aggregation.

The calculation of release dates is the responsibility of the DOC. K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(4); K.A.R. 44-6-135 and 44-6-135a. Under these circumstances, McKinney's petition purports to state a claim under K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 60-1501(a) and must be filed in the county of incarceration rather than with the sentencing court.

The trial court properly dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McKINNEY v. STATE
(Jul 28, 2000)