AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF FLORENCE R. SAVINE, RESPONDENT, v. CAROLINE SAVINE-RIVAS, APPELLANT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the order of protection expired on September 15, 1999, the appeal from the Family Court's determination that the appellant committed a family offense is not academic in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from such an adjudication (see, Matter of Cutrone v. Cutrone, 225 A.D.2d 767).

The Family Court's determination that the appellant committed a family offense within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812 was supported by the weight of the evidence.

The appellant's remaining contentions do not require reversal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SAVINE v. SAVINE-RIVAS
(Jul 31, 2000)