AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

JOHN KOROTHY et al., Appellants, v. GARY CORWIN, Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff John Korothy slipped on a small puddle of water as he was about to descend a ladder between the decks on the defendant's boat. To establish a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiffs were required to prove that the defendant created a dangerous condition, or had actual or constructive notice thereof ( see, McDuffie v. Fleet Fin. Group, 269 A.D.2d 575; Birthwright v. Mid-City Sec., 268 A.D.2d 402; Rivest v. Pizza Hut, 264 A.D.2d 388).

Under the circumstances of this case, the small puddle of water on an exterior deck of the defendant's privately-owned 28-foot-long water craft did not constitute a dangerous condition, but rather, was an open and obvious one inherent in the activity of pleasure boating ( see, Best v. Town of Islip, 265 A.D.2d 357; Egeth v. County of Westchester, 206 A.D.2d 502). In any event, the plaintiffs failed to prove that the defendant created or had actual or constructive notice of the puddle, thus precluding the imposition of liability ( see, Sanchez-Acevedo v. Mariott Health Care Serv., 270 A.D.2d 244; Paciello v. May Dept. Stores Co., 263 A.D.2d 533; Dwoskin v. Burger King Corp., 249 A.D.2d 358).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KOROTHY v. CORWIN
(Aug 7, 2000)