AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY SPOSATO, APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF PELHAM, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint pursuant to CPLR 321 1(a)(7) since the granting of a building permit "is a discretionary determination and the actions of the government in such instances are immune from lawsuits" (City of New York v. 17 Vista Assocs., 84 N.Y.2d 299, 307; see, Rottkamp v. Young, 15 N.Y.2d 831, affg 21 A.D.2d 373; Dinerman v. Poehlman, 237 A.D.2d 483; Ilson v. Incorporated Vil. of Ocean Beach, 79 A.D.2d 697). There was no special relationship between the plaintiff and the municipality (see, Rickson v. Town of Schuyler Falls, 263 A.D.2d 863; Lauer v. City of New York, 258 A.D.2d 92, revd on other grounds 95 N.Y.2d 95; Greifenberger v. Pav, 225 A.D.2d 731).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPOSATO v. VILLAGE OF PELHAM
(Aug 15, 2000)