DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The stop of the vehicle occupied by the defendant in temporal and physical proximity to the crime was proper. The vehicle matched the victims' description of the getaway vehicle and a passenger matched the description of one of the robbers (see, People v. Torres, 262 A.D.2d 161; People v. Ryan, 224 A.D.2d 644). The police also observed traffic violations in connection with the subject vehicle (see, People v. King, 266 A.D.2d 239; People v. Ortiz, 265 A.D.2d 579; People v. Henry, 258 A.D.2d 473; People v. McCoy, 239 A.D.2d 437, 439; People v. Edwards, 222 A.D.2d 603).
The defendant's contention that the People failed to disprove his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and, in any event, is without merit.