Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE DAVID EARL GIBBS, Movant Motion for an order authorizing the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, to consider a successive habeas 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application

BY THE COURT:

I

On August 15, 2000, this court issued an opinion and order denying authorization to file a successive petition. A three-judge panel was properly convened and participated at every juncture of deliberations except the final issuing of the order. One member of the panel was not available until this morning. We acted as a quorum to afford Gibbs the maximum opportunity to obtain review. Instead, Gibbs's sole response is that the order cannot be issued by a quorum of a panel. We disagree with that contention.

II

The third member of the panel now being available, the previous order is re-issued.

So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE GIBBS
(Aug 21, 2000)