DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from the post-petition order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order is not appealable as of right, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see, Family Ct Act § 35 1.1[1]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presenting agency, we find that it was legally sufficient to support the fact-finding order (cf., People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620; see, Matter of Stafford B., 187 A.D.2d 649). Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of facts, who saw and heard the witnesses (cf., People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the finding of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (cf., People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86).
There is no merit to the appellant's contention that his placement should have been less restrictive. The Family Court's decision with respect to the disposition demonstrated that it carefully considered the less restrictive alternatives to the appellant's placement and properly balanced the needs of the juvenile and the need for the protection of the community (see, Family Court Act 352.2; Matter of Jason W., 207 A.D.2d 495).