AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES B. MILLER, III, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

County Court did not err in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea without conducting a hearing. His conclusory assertions of innocence and coercion were insufficient to warrant a hearing ( see, People v. Witcher, 222 A.D.2d 1016, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 1027), and the record does not support the contentions of defendant that his waiver of indictment and guilty plea were coerced. Nor does the record support the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. "Defendant entered into an advantageous plea bargain wherein he noted his satisfaction with counsel" ( People v. Witcher, supra). Defendant's waiver of the right to appeal encompasses the contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe ( see, People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737; People v. Allen, 82 N.Y.2d 761, 763).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MILLER
(Sep 29, 2000)