AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, RESPONDENT, v. ZORKA I. BEKERUS, APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff an attorney's fee in the sum of $68,837.30; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The respondent established its entitlement to foreclose on the mortgage by producing proof at trial of the appellant's default in payment. Contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in limiting the cross-examination by the appellant's counsel (see, Linker v. Sears Roebuck Co., 232 A.D.2d 613; Ingebretsen v. Manha, 218 A.D.2d 784). The court erred, however, in awarding an attorney's fee, as the respondent failed to demonstrate the nature and extent of the services provided, or that the fee requested was reasonable (see, Centre Great Neck Co. v. Penn Encore, 255 A.D.2d 543; Sand v. Lammers, 150 A.D.2d 355, 356).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK v. BEKERUS
(Oct 2, 2000)