AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ALBERT BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility.

While the court's general comments on the jury system and its own ability to determine guilt or innocence would better have remained unsaid and were expressed in an inappropriate manner, they cannot be said to have conveyed the court's opinion as to defendant's guilt, to have minimized the importance of careful deliberations, or to have deprived defendant of a fair trial (compare, People v. Roman, 149 A.D.2d 305).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BROWN
(Oct 3, 2000)