AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSEPH CALVARUSO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. RITA CALVARUSO, APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court properly awarded the defendant 30% of the plaintiff's partnership interest in his law firm (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5][d][6]).

Moreover, the trial court properly considered all relevant factors before awarding maintenance to the defendant, and the amount and the duration of the award represent a provident exercise of discretion (see, O'Shea v. O'Shea, 237 A.D.2d 499, revd on other grounds 93 N.Y.2d 187; Sperling v. Sperling, 165 A.D.2d 338).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CALVARUSO v. CALVARUSO
(Oct 16, 2000)