AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ANNE RAFFERTY, Indi v. dually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph A. Rafferty, Sr., JOSEPH A. RAFFERTY, JR., JAMES J. RAFFERTY and BRIGID M. RAFFERTY, Plaintiffs Below-Appellants,

ORDER

It is hereby ordered this 19th day of October 2000, that the Appellants' Motion for Reargument en banc is DENIED.

[*] Retired Justice sitting by designation pursuant to Delaware Constitution Art. IV • 38.

It is further ordered that the July 12, 2000 opinion be amended by deleting the last paragraph and substituting in lieu thereof the following:

• Although we find no error in the Superior Court's dismissal of the complaint based on the record before it, in the interests of justice, we REMAND to the Superior Court for it to consider any motion to amend the complaint in order to state a proper claim.

Jurisdiction is not retained."

BY THE COURT:

/s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAFFERTY v. HARTMAN WALSH PAINTING CO., 196 (Del.Supr. 10-19-2000)
(Oct 19, 2000)