AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ALEX CHUNG, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 401/98)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. The defendant was afforded meaningful and effective representation (see, People v. Flores, 84 N.Y.2d 184, 215 F.3d 293; People v. Benn, 68 N.Y.2d 941; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

The defendant's contention that improper remarks were made by the prosecutor during summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951). In any event, any error in allowing the remarks was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CHUNG
(Oct 24, 2000)