MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner, having been found guilty of murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, commenced this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus contending that he is unlawfully detained because the order of commitment was insufficient, the indictment was defective and the sentences imposed were invalid. Supreme Court dismissed petitioner's application and we affirm. The record reveals that petitioner could have raised these issues either on his direct appeal from the judgment of conviction or by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 in the court of original jurisdiction (see, People ex rel. Rada v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 795, 711 N.Y.S.2d 921; Matter of Medina v. Senkowski, 242 A.D.2d 762). Moreover, even if petitioner were successful in his arguments, he would not be entitled to immediate release from detention (see, People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of Correction of City of N.Y., 60 N.Y.2d 648;People ex rel. Rada v. Goord, supra). Accordingly, habeas corpus relief is unavailable to petitioner.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.