A preponderance of the credible evidence established that respondent abused her daughter, Destiny, who sustained a severe and inadequately explained second-degree head burn while in respondent's care (see Family Court Act § 1046 (a)(ii); Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238,243-244;Matter of Jorge S., 211 A.D.2d 513, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 810). The finding of abuse with respect to Destiny is additionally warranted by respondent's failure to seek prompt medical attention for Destiny, which omission required Destiny's hospitalization for a period of weeks when the untreated burn became infected.
Also proper under the circumstances of this case was the derivative finding of abuse with respect to respondent's son Quincy. Proof of physical injury was not necessary as to the directly abused child's sibling (see, Family Court Act § 1046(a)(i); Matter of Jorela L., 222 A.D.2d 282, 283). Respondent's challenge to the placements directed in the appealed order is academic since the one-year term of those placements has expired and subsequent orders extending the children's placements have been entered (see, Matter of Angelina E., 213 A.D.2d 346, 347; Matter of Jorge S., supra).
On the totality of the existing record, it is clear that respondent received effective assistance of counsel in this matter.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.