AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. GORDON DAVIS, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 2824/95)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly permitted the prosecutor to use the defendant's testimony from a prior trial involving another participant in the murder and the defendant's prior statement to the police as evidence at his own trial (see, People v. Evans, 58 N.Y.2d 14, 24).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Smith, 59 N.Y.2d 156; People v. Rosenblum, 218 A.D.2d 823). His sentence was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DAVIS
(Oct 30, 2000)