AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

KAY LeROY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WARNER LeROY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The award was a proper exercise of discretion (Domestic Relations Law § 237[a]; see, O'Shea v. O'Shea, 93 N.Y.2d 187, 192, 193), there being ample basis for finding that plaintiff lacked the money to pay for her attorneys' services on the appeal, and that defendant, who, pending the appeal, remained in control of nearly the entire marital estate, including all liquid assets, had the ability to pay therefor. In determining the amount of the then still prospective fee, the trial court properly relied upon its own knowledge, experience and familiarity with the parties' financial circumstances (see, Caldwell v. Caldwell, 209 A.D.2d 1022).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LeROY v. LeROY
(Oct 31, 2000)