Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ALEX T. NICOTRA, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. KAREN ROWE, RICHARD ROWE and JAMES A. FUQUA, JR., Defendants Below, Appellees.

Unpublished Opinion is below.

ALEX T. NICOTRA, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. KAREN ROWE, RICHARD ROWE and JAMES A. FUQUA, JR., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 188, 2000. In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: October 31, 2000. Decided: November 1, 2000.

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County C.A. No. 2023-S

Before WALSH, BERGER, and STEELE, Justices.

ORDER

This 1st day of November 2000, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, the Court concludes that the Court of Chancery did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and in dismissing appellant's petition as frivolous. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Chancery is affirmed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:. Joseph T.Walsh Justice

O'MAYES V. STATE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NICOTRA v. ROWE
(Nov 1, 2000)