AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. J.T. EDWARD JACKSON, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 12107/97)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the defense counsel's cross-examination of the police detective who conducted the murder investigation opened the door to the admission of hearsay testimony on redirect examination of the witness to explain why the police had limited their investigation to the defendant (see, People v. Melendez, 55 N.Y.2d 445; People v. Bernard, 214 A.D.2d 576). Further, the court gave the jury proper limiting instructions regarding the purpose for which the testimony was received.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JACKSON
(Oct 30, 2000)