A reasonable view of the evidence supports a finding that defendant's snow removal procedures at the site where plaintiff fell, including, in particular, plowing that could cause snow to accumulate near curb cuts in the sidewalk and salt spreading that could cause snow to melt and re-freeze at curb cuts, were negligent and that such negligence created a dangerous condition that caused plaintiff to fall (see, Glick v. City of New York, 139 A.D.2d 402; Figueroa v. Lazarus Burman Assocs._, 269 A.D.2d 215). Nor does the award of damages materially deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances. Plaintiff, in her forties, suffered a fractured tibia and fibula, underwent four surgeries and can be expected to undergo more, faces a prospect of degenerative arthritis in her ankle, which is permanently scared and swollen, and has suffered diminished ability to perform daily activities (cf., Dauria v. City of New York, 178 A.D.2d 289, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 751;Cranston v. Oxford Resources Corp., 173 A.D.2d 757, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 860.). We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.