AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MELISSA RIGAGLIA, RESPONDENT, v. CARMELO RIGAGLIA, APPELLANT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in awarding pendente lite maintenance, child support, and counsel fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][6]; Piali v. Piali, 247 A.D.2d 455, 456; Lloyd v. McGrath, 246 A.D.2d 630). Moreover, the court correctly imputed income to the parties (see, Mellen v. Mellen, 260 A.D.2d 609; Brown v. Brown, 239 A.D.2d 535; Matter of Prill v. Mandell, 237 A.D.2d 445, 446; Matter of Mobley-Jennings v. Dare, 226 A.D.2d 730). The proper remedy for any perceived inequities in such an award is a speedy trial, where the financial circumstances of the parties can be explored on a full record (see, Piali v. Piali, supra; Lloyd v. McGrath, supra).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RIGAGLIA v. RIGAGLIA
(Nov 6, 2000)