DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, the action against the remaining defendants is severed, and a new trial is ordered on the issue of liability.
After alighting from a bus operated by the defendant New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the NYCTA), the plaintiff Wilguerson Georges (hereinafter the plaintiff) was struck by a car driven by the defendant Ravin Rajnarine. It is well settled that a common carrier owes a duty to an alighting passenger to stop at a place where the passenger may safely disembark and leave the area (see, Miller v. Fernan, 73 N.Y.2d 844; Blye v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 124 A.D.2d 106, affd 72 N.Y.2d 888). A carrier's duty to its passenger terminates when he or she alights safely onto the curb (see, Kramer v. Lagnese, 144 A.D.2d 648, 649).
In the case at bar, the bus allegedly stopped at an angle which caused its rear portion to be further away from the curb than usual. Nevertheless, the plaintiff was not in any direct danger when he exited the rear door of the bus and could have easily walked a few feet from the point of departure to the sidewalk. However, after alighting from the bus, the plaintiff instead chose to walk to the back of the bus, where he then turned right, began to cross the street, and was struck by the car. Under these circumstances, there was no causal connection between the plaintiff's accident and the fact that the bus stopped at an angle several feet from the curb. Thus, as a matter of law, the NYCTA is not liable (see, Falvey v. United States Gypsum Co., 21 N.Y.2d 839; Kramer v. Lagnese, supra; Matter of Eisenberg v. Village of Mamaroneck, 137 A.D.2d 817; Brooks v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 94 A.D.2d 656).