AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ANDREW E. CHURBY, APPELLANT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court improperly imposed a greater sentence than what had been promised is not preserved for appellate review, as he neither objected to the sentence on that ground nor moved to vacate his plea (see, People v. Wilson, 257 A.D.2d 674; People v. Gayle, 224 A.D.2d 710). In addition, since the defendant has been released from incarceration, rendering his claim largely academic, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CHURBY
(Nov 21, 2000)