DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff's sole contention on appeal is that the Supreme Court erred in failing to grant her an extension of time to serve the respondents in the interest of justice pursuant to CPLR 306-b. However, her argument, raised for the first time on appeal, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Fleet Bank v. Powerhouse Trading Corp., 267 A.D.2d 276, 277; Dufficy v. Wharf Bar Grill, 217 A.D.2d 646), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.