The proof was legally sufficient and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The requisite larcenous intent can be reasonably inferred from the evidence. Defendant's related arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.