MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit fighting, violent conduct and disobeying a direct order. Petitioner offered unrefuted testimony that he was not the aggressor of the fight but was attacked by an inmate with a metal shank. Nevertheless, the misbehavior report states that petitioner ignored several direct orders to stop fighting and continued to struggle and resist after being forcibly removed from the other inmate. Under the particular circumstances presented here, we find that the misbehavior report, written by the correction officer who restrained petitioner, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt as to the charges, regardless of who initiated the fight (see,People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130; see also, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966).
Contrary to petitioner's assertion, it was within the province of the Hearing Officer, upon consideration of all the evidence (particularly petitioner's conduct upon being removed from the other inmate) and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, to discredit petitioner's contention that he was acting strictly in self-defense (see, Matter of Anderson v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 896; Matter of Baez v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 741). Moreover, petitioner's justification defense was aptly considered when the penalty imposed was ultimately reduced.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.