Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Matrix Properties Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, formerly known as E.W. Wylie Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee v. TAG In

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] TAG Investments and James A. Grettum appealed from a district court's post-judgment order determining that its prior judgment, as affirmed by this Court in Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG Investments, 2000 ND 88, 609 N.W.2d 737, required TAG and Grettum to transfer property in accordance with Matrix Properties Corporation's exercise of an option under the parties' 1996 agreement. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). Double costs are awarded to Matrix under N.D.R.App.P. 38 and 39. We further direct the district court to order specific performance requiring TAG and Grettum to convey the subject property upon tender by Matrix of the purchase price set in the 1996 option agreement.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

William F. Hodny, S.J.

[¶ 3] The Honorable William F. Hodny, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATRIX PROPERTIES CORP. v. TAG INVESTMENTS
(Dec 12, 2000)