Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Kurt W. Schumacher, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Coreen D. Schumacher, Defendant and Appellee

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Kurt W. Schumacher appeals from a Northwest Judicial District Court order modifying his spousal support obligation and denying his motion to modify child support. Concluding the judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHUMACHER v. SCHUMACHER
(Dec 7, 2000)