Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE C., RESPONDENT, v. PAUL D. BROWN, APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

A determination whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry into defendant's home involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review (see, People v Hallman, 92 N.Y.2d 840; People v Cloud, 79 N.Y.2d 786; People v Burr, 70 N.Y.2d 354).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BROWN
(Dec 14, 2000)