AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of REGINALD TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. CHARLES DUFRAIN, as Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Spain, J.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination which, after a tier II hearing, found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Respondents argue that the proceeding is untimely. We agree.

Petitioner concedes in his petition that he received the denial of his administrative appeal on April 15, 1999. Inasmuch as August 15, 1999 was a Sunday, the last day for the commencement of this proceeding within the applicable four-month Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 217) was August 16, 1999 (see, General Construction Law § 25-a). Petitioner did not verify his petition until that date, when he also mailed the petition and an unsigned copy of the order to show cause to the Franklin County Clerk's office. The papers were not received until August 19, 1999. The order to show cause was not executed until August 27, 1999 and it was filed four days later. Petitioner does not claim that his incarceration prevented him from timely commencement or otherwise explain the delay. Therefore, the proceeding was not timely commenced (see, Matter of Wright v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 876; Matter of Shell v. McCray, 261 A.D.2d 664).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF TAYLOR v. DUFRAIN
(Dec 21, 2000)