DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment and the order are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The plaintiff was injured when a tool chest manufactured by the appellant, Snap-On Corporation, a/k/a Snap-On Tools Corporation, detached from another tool chest manufactured by the appellant when he attempted to move it. The jury found the appellant 100% at fault in the happening of the accident.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and for a new trial (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129). The plaintiff's description of the occurrence was sufficient to establish that the defective attachment and sharp edge of the tool chest proximately caused his injury (see, Voss v. Black Decker Mfg. Co., 59 N.Y.2d 102). It was not necessary that the plaintiff positively exclude every possible cause of the accident (see, Gayle v. City of New York, 92 N.Y.2d 936). The proof need only render the other possible causes so remote or technical that the verdict is based on logical inferences drawn from the evidence (see, Schneider v. Kings Highway Hosp. Ctr., 67 N.Y.2d 743).
Moreover, in view of the nature and extent of the injury to the then-28-year-old plaintiff's dominant right hand, and the fact that he depended on his hands for his livelihood, the verdict is not excessive (see, Nussbaum v. Gibstein, 73 N.Y.2d 912).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.