AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RICHARD SCHNEIDMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STANLEY TOLLMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, PHILIP S. KAUFMAN and HARVEY MARTIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The motion court properly held that plaintiffs have standing to interpose their amended complaint, since their individual claims are separate and independent from a claim on behalf of the partnership (see,MK W. St. Co. v. Meridien Hotels, 184 A.D.2d 312, 313). The motion court also properly found that plaintiffs' amended pleadings were not time-barred, since they relate back to the original complaint, merely adding "additional factual detail" (see, State of New York v. St. James Nursing Home, 128 A.D.2d 694, 695).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHNEIDMAN v. TOLLMAN
(Jan 9, 2001)