Michael DeMarco, J.
Under the unique circumstances of this case and in light of the frequency with which both sides have resorted to judicial intervention in discovery disputes in the three years prior to the instant motion to strike the note of issue, the failure of defendants to include an affirmation of good faith is excusable because any effort to resolve the present dispute non-judicially would have been "futile" ( see, Qian v. Dugan, 256 A.D.2d 782; Gardner v. Kawasaki Heavy Indus., 213 A.D.2d 840, 841). We find, however, that it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the motion court to have made any directive unavoidably requiring the production of medical records pertaining to the nonparty birth mother, who does not appear to have been served with the motion ( see, Monica W. v. Milevoi, 252 A.D.2d 260, 262-263). We do not otherwise perceive any improvident exercise of discretion ( see, Law v. City of New York, 250 A.D.2d 540; DeStrange v. Lind, 277 A.D.2d 344). We reject plaintiffs' argument that the cross appeal should be dismissed on procedural grounds.