AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

AAMES CAPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. Crisencio Vallar VISORIA, Victoria Pabo Visoria, and Joann Urubio VISORIA, Defendants-Appellants and Perfect Title Company and John and Mary Does 1-20, Doe Partnerships, Corporations, or Other Entities 2-20, Defendants.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) the appeal of the September 27, 2000 order denying relief under HRCP 60(b) from the judgment of foreclosure is an appeal from the second part of the foreclosure case filed in Civil No. 97-1038; (2) the second part of the foreclosure case has not been finally completed inasmuch as a deficiency judgment has yet to be entered; see Hoge v. Kane I, 4 Haw. App. 246, 247, 663 P.2d 645, 647 (1983); and, thus, (3) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AAMES CAPITAL CORPORATION v. VISORIA, 23840 (Haw. 2-1-2001)
(Feb 1, 2001)