AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

GARRET J. NAQUIN ET AL. v. NOKIA MOBILE PHONES, INC. ET AL.

ORDER AND REASONS

IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, United States District Judge

Before the court are Westinghouse Electric Corporation's Motion to Dismiss and Alternatively Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Rec. Doc. No. 59) and Philips Electronic North America Company's ("PENAC") Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process(Rec. Doc. No. 44). Westinghouse contends that the plaintiffs' attempt to serve Westinghouse Corporation was improper and insufficient in part because there is no entity known as Westinghouse Corporation. PENAC also contends that service was attempted on a Philips Corporation, which does not exist. This Court entered a voluntary dismissal without prejudice on behalf of Westinghouse Corporation and Philips Corporation on February 1, 2001. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Westinghouse Electric Corporation's Motion to Dismiss and Alternatively Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Philips Electronic North America Company's Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Process are DISMISSED as MOOT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NAQUIN v. NOKIA MOBILE PHONES, INC. (E.D.La. 2001)
(Feb 1, 2001)