AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD BROWN, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 98-01568).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the sentence imposed was not the sentence originally promised, and that the court should have afforded him an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea. However, since the defendant did not seek to withdraw his plea or move to vacate the judgment, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Churby, ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., Nov. 20, 2000]; People v. Pike, ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., Oct. 16, 2000]; People v. Walters, 273 A.D.2d 418; People v. Gayle, 224 A.D.2d 710). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that the sentence imposed was the one promised to the defendant.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BROWN
(Feb 5, 2001)