Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CROSBY et al. v. COOPER TIRE RUBBER COMPANY; and

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

In Cooper Tire and Rubber Company v. Crosby, 273 Ga. App. 454 ( 543 S.E.2d 21)(2001), The Supreme Court found that this Court erred in Crosby v. Cooper Tire Rubber Co., 240 Ga. App 857 in ruling that the trial court was required to admit evidence of consumer claims honored by the tire manufacturer for tires manufactured at the tire plant where the tire involved in this action was manufactured. The Supreme Court found that [w]ithout an independent showing of a substantial similarity between the purported tire defect that caused the injuries in this case and the basis for the consumer claims that were honored by the manufacturer, this evidence was inadmissable. Id. Therefore, we vacate that portion of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for new trial. Blackburn, C. J., and Barnes, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 13, 2001.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CROSBY v. COOPER TIRE AND RUBBER CO
(Feb 16, 2001)