AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID ROEMER, APPELLANT, v. HERBERT MONTE LEVY, RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To state a cause of action sounding in legal malpractice, a plaintiff must show that the defendant failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly exercised by an ordinary member of the legal community, and that but for the attorney's negligence, the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying action (see, Kozmol v. Law Firm of Allen L. Rothenberg, 241 A.D.2d 484; Platt v. Portnoy, 220 A.D.2d 652). After the defendant made out a prima facie case that he was entitled to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROEMER v. LEVY
(Feb 20, 2001)