Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. STEVE MICHAEL BARR

Granted with order. See per curiam.

CDT

PFC

CDK

BJJ

JPV

JTK

LEMMON, J., concurs, but would not base the decision, even in part, on State v. Hornung, 620 So.2d 816 (La 1993), in which I dissented.

PER CURIAM:

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the Third Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration as an appeal. To the extent that La.R.S. 14:40.2 (B)(1) provides for a penalty in excess of six months in jail, it defines an offense triable by a jury. La. Const. art. I, § 17; La.C.Cr.P. art. 779 (A). Moreover, to the extent that the defendant faced a total sentencing exposure exceeding six months imprisonment following the consolidation of the four bills of information for trial, the defendant became entitled to a jury trial as to all of the charged misdemeanor offenses. State v. Hornung, 620 So.2d 816, 817 (La. 1993). The defendant's remedy upon conviction and sentence was therefore by appeal and not by supervisory review. La. Const. art. V, § 10 (A)( 3); La.C.Cr.P. art. 912.1 (B); State v. Swan, 544 So.2d 1204, 1206, n. 3 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1989)

LEMMON, J., concurs, but would not base the decision, even in part, on State v. Hornung, 620 So.2d 816, (La. 1973), in which I dissented.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BARR, 2000-1787 (La. 3/9/01)
(Mar 9, 2001)