AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

REGINA MITCHELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THOMAS CUNNINGHAM, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

There is no merit to plaintiffs' contention that defendant is estopped from asserting that New York courts lack jurisdiction over his person because he failed to notify the Department of Motor Vehicles of his new, out-of-State address pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 505(5)(see, Keane v. Kamin, 94 N.Y.2d 263). There is simply no jurisdictional predicate for this action. Defendant was not a domiciliary of New York, either at the time of the complained of New Jersey accident or at the time the action was commenced (id.).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. CUNNINGHAM
(Mar 8, 2001)