Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

JANE DOE and JOAN ROE, on behalf of themsel v. s and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the March 3, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals with the direction that the special panel which decided this case consider whether plaintiffs' claims are barred because recent amendments (1999 PA 201) to the Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.1101 et seq.; MSA 3.550(101) et seq., should be applied retroactively to this case. See Plaut v Spendthrift Farms, 514 U.S. 211; 115 S.Ct. 1447; 131 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995). The opinion after remand shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court.

We retain jurisdiction.

Kelly, J., would grant leave to appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOE v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
(Mar 27, 2001)