MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination which found him guilty of committing an unhygienic act on the ground that his disciplinary hearing was not timely commenced. Supreme Court denied the application and we affirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the delay in commencement of the hearing was authorized by a valid extension indicating that the hearing was to be completed within 13 days after his release from confinement for mental health observation (see, Matter of Lashway v. Kuhlmann, 278 A.D.2d 605, 718 N.Y.S.2d 421;Matter of Pabon v. Kuhlmann, 269 A.D.2d 635). Petitioner's hearing began on the sixth day and concluded on the eighth day following his return to the correctional facility from an off-site mental health facility, well within the time frame established by the extension.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.