Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Attorney(S) Damien Williams, Malone, petitioner in person. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent. Judges Karen K. Peters See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. In the Matter of DAMIEN WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT Lahtinen, JJ. Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting escape and leaving an assigned area without authorization. Initially, the record reveals that petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge of leaving an assigned area without authorization and, therefore, is precluded from asserting that the determination as to such charge is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Grof v. Goord, 278 A.D.2d 650, 718 N.Y.S.2d 234). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony offered at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt with respect to the escape charge (see, Matter of Rosario v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 714, appeal dismissed 95 N.Y.2d 822). Petitioner's assertion that he cannot be found guilty of such charge because he absconded from his work site and not the correctional facility is rejected. The relevant rule provides that "[i]nmates shall not escape, attempt to escape, conspire to, or be an accessory to an escape from any correctional facility orcorrectional custody" ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [9] [i] [emphasis supplied]). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been examined and found to be without merit. ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.