Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RONALD NAPOLITANO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ronald Napolitano, appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse.

Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere and was sentenced to seven years in prison on April 24, 1998. He did not appeal, but filed the instant motion on June 8, 2000. The state agrees that the trial court erred in summarily denying the motion as untimely, as the motion was acknowledged before a notary on May 23, 2000, and appellant's certificate of service shows the same date.

Appellant's conviction and sentence became final on May 26, 1998, when the time within which he could have filed an appeal expired. See Caracciolo v. State, 564 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Ramos v. State, 658 So.2d 169, 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Gust v. State, 535 So.2d 642, 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Therefore, appellant had until May 26, 2000, in which to file a rule 3.850 motion. His motion should be treated as timely filed on May 23, 2000, the date he apparently turned it over to prison authorities for mailing. See Thompson v. State, 761 So.2d 324, 325 (Fla. 2000). The state admits it cannot rebut the presumption that appellant placed his motion in the hands of prison officials on May 23, 2000, because appellant's institution does not maintain logs of outgoing mail. See also Rector v. State, 668 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that post-conviction motion that is notarized on a certain date is deemed filed on that date).

May 24, 1998 was a Sunday; May 25, 1998 was Memorial Day.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the merits of appellant's post-conviction motion.

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., Concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NAPOLITANO v. STATE
(Apr 25, 2001)