DECISION ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 16, 2000, as denied that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on Labor Law § 240(1).
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's cause of action under Labor Law § 240(1) is granted, and that cause of action is dismissed.
The plaintiff, a mechanic, was injured when he fell from a ladder while inspecting a sprinkler system control valve. The work performed by the plaintiff at the time of the accident was routine maintenance of a sprinkler system and did not constitute "erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning or pointing of a building or structure" within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1) so as to bring him within the ambit of the statute (see, Martinez v. City of New York, 93 N.Y.2d 322, 326; Breeden v. Sunset Indus. Park Assocs., 275 A.D.2d 726; Pound v. A.V.R. Realty Corp., 271 A.D.2d 424).