AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN A. HORN, respondent, v. MUNICIPAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., appellant, ET AL., defendant.

DECISION ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Municipal Information Services, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered May 4, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion to disqualify John R. Lewis as its counsel on the ground of a conflict of interest.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the disqualification of an attorney is a matter which rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, Olmoz v. Town of Fishkill, 258 A.D.2d 447; Fischer v. Deitsch, 168 A.D.2d 599; Narel Apparel v. American Utex Int., 92 A.D.2d 913, 914). A party's entitlement to be represented in ongoing litigation by counsel of its own choosing is a valued right which should not be abridged absent a clear showing that disqualification is warranted (see, Olmoz v. Town of Fishkill, supra; Feeley v. Midas Props., 199 A.D.2d 238), and the movant bears the burden on such motion (see, Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner Landis, 89 N.Y.2d 123, 131; Solow v. Grace B. Co., 83 N.Y.2d 303, 308; see also, S S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp., 69 N.Y.2d 437, 445).

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion to disqualify John R. Lewis as counsel for the defendant Municipal Information Services, Inc., as the plaintiff met its burden of showing that disqualification was warranted based upon a conflict of interest (see, Olmoz v. Town of Fishkill, supra).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HORN v. MUNICIPAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC
(Apr 30, 2001)