Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

DOMINICK L. N. OBERLE, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. CLAYTON T. SHOHO, Defendant-Appellee and Doe Defendants 1-100, Defendants and CLAYTON T. SHOHO, Third-Party Plaintiff vs. MARIA MUNOZ, Third-Party Defendant.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) the judgment entered on October 11, 2000, which purports to be the final judgment in Civil No. 96-3968, does not enter judgment in favor of and against the parties on the plaintiff's complaint; see Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming Wright, 76 Haw. 115, 119-20, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338-39 (1994) (a judgment entered pursuant to HRCP 58 is not appealable unless it enters judgment in favor of and against the appropriate parties on the claim for which the judgment is entered); and thus, (2) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OBERLE v. SHOHO, 24039 (Haw. 5-1-2001)
(May 1, 2001)