AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THOMAS SANTORELLI, respondent, v. APPLE EVE, L.P., ET AL., defendants, JOHANNA FOODS, INC., ET AL., appellants.

DECISION ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages based on product liability, the defendants Johanna Foods, Inc., and Lacto Milk Products appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered August 25, 2000, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff commenced the instant action against multiple parties, including the appellants, to recover damages for physical and psychological injuries he allegedly suffered when he drank juice which was contaminated. It is undisputed that when the appellant first opened the juice it tasted fine and showed signs of contamination only after it had been in his refrigerator for some time. The appellant Johanna Foods, Inc. manufactured the juice in question. Johanna Foods, Inc., and the defendant Lacto Milk Products, apparently a separate but related company, moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The Supreme Court denied their motion. We reverse.

In order to prevail in this action the plaintiff must establish "that a defect in the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury and * * * that the defect complained of existed at the time the product left the manufacturer or entity in the line of distribution being sued" (Tardella v. RJR Nabisco, 178 A.D.2d 737; see also, Hohn v. South Shore Serv., 141 A.D.2d 504; Vamos v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y., 165 Misc.2d 388, 390). In opposition to the appellants' prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with regard to the above factors. Therefore, the appellants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them (see, CPLR 3212[b]; Tardella v. RJR Nabisco, supra).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SANTORELLI v. APPLE EVE, L.P
(Apr 30, 2001)