MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner has been in prison since 1992 serving a prison sentence of 8 to 25 years after having been convicted upon a plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree. The conviction emanates from an incident in which petitioner placed her newborn son in a plastic bag and dropped him down a garbage chute. In May 1999, the Board of Parole denied petitioner's application for parole release. Supreme Court dismissed the CPLR article 78 proceeding to review that determination and we affirm.
The record demonstrates that the Board considered the relevant statutory factors in denying petitioner's request for parole release. The Board is not required to enumerate or give equal weight to each statutory factor (see, Matter of Charlemagne v. State of New York Div. of Parole, 281 A.D.2d 669 [Mar. 1, 2001]) or to expressly discuss each factor considered (see, Matter of Rivera v. State of New York Executive Dept. Bd. of Parole, 268 A.D.2d 928). Moreover, an application for parole release shall not be granted merely as a reward for petitioner's good conduct or achievements while incarcerated (see, Matter of Guerin v. New York State Div. of Parole, 276 A.D.2d 899; see also, Executive Law § 259-i [c]), and the Board's emphasis on the serious nature of petitioner's crime does not demonstrate that the determination was affected by a "`showing of irrationality bordering on impropriety'" (Matter of Silmon v. Travis, 95 N.Y.2d 470, 476, quoting Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 77). Accordingly, we perceive no basis upon which to disturb the discretionary determination that petitioner was not an acceptable candidate for parole release (see,Matter of Felder v. Travis, 278 A.D.2d 570, 717 N.Y.S.2d 683).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.